Radiation Dose Calculator

Convert absorbed dose in gray to equivalent and effective dose in sieverts using ICRP 103 weighting factors.

🛡️ Radiation Dose Calculator

🛡️ What is Radiation Dose?

Radiation dose quantifies how much ionising radiation energy is deposited in biological tissue and - crucially - what biological damage that deposition causes. Three distinct quantities are used in radiation protection, each serving a different purpose: absorbed dose, equivalent dose, and effective dose. The distinction matters enormously because 1 gray of alpha radiation is ~20 times more biologically damaging than 1 gray of gamma radiation, and because a given equivalent dose to the lung poses a different cancer risk than the same dose to the skin.

The framework was developed over decades by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP), first codified in ICRP Publication 60 (1990) and updated in ICRP Publication 103 (2007) - the current international standard, adopted by the IAEA, UNSCEAR, WHO, and national regulatory bodies including the AERB (India), NRC (USA), and PHE (UK). This calculator applies the ICRP 103 weighting factors throughout.

Three main radiation types require different weighting: photons (gamma rays, X-rays) and beta particles have wR = 1 - 1 Gy = 1 Sv. Alpha particles have wR = 20 - 1 Gy of alpha = 20 Sv equivalent. Neutrons have an energy-dependent wR ranging from 2.5 (thermal) to ~20 (around 1 MeV). The highest alpha wR explains why Polonium-210 poisoning (Alexander Litvinenko, 2006) and radon inhalation are disproportionately dangerous - inhaled alpha emitters irradiate bronchial epithelium directly with no skin protection.

Effective dose is the quantity used in regulatory limits and medical dose reporting. It weights equivalent dose to each organ by the organ's cancer risk contribution (tissue weighting factor wT), giving a single number representing the whole-body risk equivalent. This calculator covers all five radiation types, all 15 ICRP 103 tissue types, and compares calculated doses to the annual background and regulatory limits.

📐 Formula

Step 1 - Equivalent Dose:
H = wR × D
H = equivalent dose (sievert, Sv)
D = absorbed dose (gray, Gy = J/kg)
wR = radiation weighting factor (dimensionless)
Step 2 - Effective Dose:
E = ∑ wT × HT
E = effective dose (sievert, Sv)
HT = equivalent dose to tissue T
wT = tissue weighting factor (ICRP 103, dimensionless, all sum to 1.0)
ICRP 103 Radiation Weighting Factors:
Photons (gamma, X-ray): wR = 1
Electrons & muons (beta): wR = 1
Protons & charged pions: wR = 2
Alpha particles, fission fragments: wR = 20
Neutrons: wR = 2.5 to 20 (energy-dependent; ~20 at 1 MeV)
Key Tissue Weighting Factors (ICRP 103):
Lung, stomach, colon, bone marrow, breast: wT = 0.12
Gonads: wT = 0.08
Bladder, liver, thyroid, oesophagus: wT = 0.04
Skin, bone surface, brain, salivary glands: wT = 0.01

📖 How to Use This Calculator

1
Enter the absorbed dose in Gy, mGy, µGy, or rad - and select the unit.
2
Select the radiation type - the ICRP 103 weighting factor wR is applied automatically.
3
Select the exposed tissue - for whole-body exposures, use "Whole body uniform". For partial-body, select the specific organ.
4
Click Calculate - results show equivalent dose H, effective dose E, and comparison to annual background radiation.

💡 Example Calculations

Example 1 - Chest CT scan (gamma radiation, whole body)

A chest CT delivers 7 mGy absorbed dose. What is the effective dose?

1
D = 7 mGy = 0.007 Gy | Radiation: gamma (wR = 1) | Tissue: lung (wT = 0.12, dominant organ for chest CT)
2
H = 1 × 0.007 = 0.007 Sv = 7 mSv
3
E (lung only) = 0.12 × 0.007 = 0.00084 Sv = 0.84 mSv
Effective dose (lung): 0.84 mSv - about 35% of annual background (2.4 mSv/yr)
Try this example →

Example 2 - Alpha radiation from inhaled radon daughters

Lung tissue receives 0.5 mGy absorbed dose from alpha-emitting radon daughters (Rn-222 progeny). What is the equivalent and effective dose?

1
D = 0.5 mGy = 0.0005 Gy | Radiation: alpha (wR = 20) | Tissue: lung (wT = 0.12)
2
H = 20 × 0.0005 = 0.01 Sv = 10 mSv equivalent dose
3
E = 0.12 × 0.01 = 0.0012 Sv = 1.2 mSv effective dose
Equivalent dose: 10 mSv (20× gamma amplification) | Effective dose: 1.2 mSv
Try this example →

Example 3 - Occupational gamma radiation (whole body, annual dose)

A nuclear plant worker receives 15 mGy whole-body gamma dose in a year. How does this compare to regulatory limits?

1
D = 15 mGy | Radiation: gamma (wR = 1) | Whole body (wT = 1.0)
2
H = 1 × 0.015 = 0.015 Sv = 15 mSv
3
E = 1.0 × 0.015 = 15 mSv/yr
Effective dose: 15 mSv/yr - below the 20 mSv/yr occupational limit (ICRP 103 / AERB), 6.25× annual background
Try this example →

Example 4 - Thyroid cancer therapy with I-131

The thyroid gland receives 80 Gy absorbed dose from beta/gamma I-131 therapy. What is the effective dose?

1
D = 80 Gy | Radiation: beta/gamma (wR = 1) | Tissue: thyroid (wT = 0.04)
2
H = 1 × 80 = 80 Sv equivalent dose (thyroid)
3
E = 0.04 × 80 = 3.2 Sv effective dose - this is a therapeutic ablation dose, not occupational exposure
Thyroid equivalent dose: 80 Sv (ablative) | Effective dose: 3.2 Sv
Try this example →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between absorbed dose, equivalent dose, and effective dose?+
Absorbed dose (Gy) = energy deposited per unit mass of tissue, regardless of radiation type. Equivalent dose (Sv) = absorbed dose × radiation weighting factor wR, accounting for biological damage potential. Effective dose (Sv) = sum of (equivalent dose × tissue weighting factor wT), giving a single whole-body risk number for partial exposures.
What are ICRP 103 radiation weighting factors?+
ICRP Publication 103 (2007) values: photons = 1; beta/electrons = 1; protons = 2; alpha/heavy ions = 20; neutrons = 2.5–20 (energy dependent, peaks at ~1 MeV). Alpha's high wR = 20 means 1 Gy of alpha radiation has the same biological effect as 20 Gy of gamma - explaining why inhaled alpha emitters like radon and plutonium are disproportionately hazardous.
What is the annual background radiation dose?+
The global average annual effective dose from natural background is 2.4 mSv/yr (UNSCEAR 2008). Sources: radon inhalation 52%, terrestrial gamma 20%, cosmic 16%, food/water 12%. Range: ~1 mSv/yr at sea level to over 10 mSv/yr at high altitude or in high-radon areas (Kerala coast, Ramsar Iran).
What are the regulatory dose limits for radiation workers and the public?+
Per ICRP 103: Occupational - 20 mSv/yr (5-year average), max 50 mSv in any year. Public - 1 mSv/yr (excluding natural background and medical doses). Emergency workers - up to 100 mSv for saving life. India's AERB follows ICRP 103 limits. US NRC limits: 50 mSv/yr occupational (= 5 rem in the old system).
What dose causes acute radiation syndrome?+
ARS thresholds: 100 mGy - possible minor blood changes; 500 mGy - mild ARS in 5–10%; 1 Gy - mild ARS in most; 2 Gy - bone marrow syndrome, ~5% fatality without treatment; 4–6 Gy - LD50/60 (50% die in 60 days without care); 10 Gy - GI syndrome, near-certain fatality; >20 Gy - CNS syndrome, death in hours to days.
What is the effective dose from common medical imaging procedures?+
Dental X-ray: ~0.005 mSv. Chest X-ray: ~0.02 mSv. Mammogram: ~0.4 mSv. CT head: ~2 mSv. CT chest: ~7 mSv. CT abdomen/pelvis: ~10 mSv. Whole-body CT: ~10–25 mSv. PET scan (F-18 FDG): ~7 mSv. Thyroid I-131 scan: ~14 mSv. All are far below acute effect thresholds but contribute to lifetime stochastic risk.
How does shielding reduce radiation exposure?+
Gamma/X-rays: I = I₀e^(−μx) - exponential attenuation; lead is effective. Beta: stopped by a few mm of aluminium or plastic (use low-Z to avoid bremsstrahlung). Alpha: stopped by paper or a few cm of air. Neutrons: hydrogen-rich material (water, polyethylene) moderates by elastic scattering. Distance: intensity falls as 1/r². Time minimisation also reduces dose proportionally.
What is the difference between deterministic and stochastic radiation effects?+
Deterministic effects have a dose threshold; above it, severity increases with dose (e.g. skin burns, cataracts, ARS). Stochastic effects have no confirmed threshold - probability increases with dose but severity (cancer) is fixed. Regulatory limits are designed to keep stochastic risk acceptably low using the linear no-threshold (LNT) model, which is conservative and used for radiation protection even though its validity at very low doses is debated.